Cases 61 - 70 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01483
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Monroe v. Reister et al
as 3:2013cv00625
Defendant:
City of Portland, Michael Reese and Dane Reister
Plaintiff:
William Kyle Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baugh v. Holder et al
as 3:2013cv00561
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Baugh
Defendant:
City of Portland Oregon, John Doe 1-2, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Reese
as 3:2012cv01999
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Barnes
Defendant:
Michael Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Portland et al
as 3:2012cv01222
Defendant:
Timothy Manzella, City of Portland, Michael Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Roberta F. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stephens et al v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2012cv00171
Defendant:
Dr. Juile Andrews, John Barker, Rex Burkholder and others
Plaintiff:
Karellen Stephens, Qadira Stephens and Renee Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00068
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Miller v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2011cv01509
Defendant:
City of Portland, Dean Halley and Michael Reese
Plaintiff:
Scott Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Karboau v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv06312
Defendant:
Alica Aleson, Trent Axen, Bales and others
Plaintiff:
Milaudi Karboau
Amicu:
Officer Park and Counselor Ragland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
