Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Pollock v. Peterson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00457
Plaintiff: Keith W Pollak and Keith W Pollock
Defendant: Reese Peterson, Potter and County Cops
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEITH v. IN DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv01334
Plaintiff: REESE KEITH
Defendant: IN DEPT. OF CORRECTION, JACK HENDRIX and WILLIAM WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff: JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KEITH v. ZATECKY
as 1:2021cv01911
Petitioner: REESE KEITH
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pratt v. Society et al
as 3:2021cv00310
Defendant: LaPorte County Metro Operations, LaPorte City Police Department, Nigel Albaneze and others
Plaintiff: Robert Omar Pratt, Jr, Rev Robert O Pratt, Jr and Robert Omer Pratt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEITH v. VANDINE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03036
Plaintiff: REESE L. KEITH
Defendant: M. VANDINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEITH v. MASON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02740
Defendant: BAGIENSKI, OFFICE OF WEXFORD, JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff: REESE LEVI KEITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEITH v. ZATECKY
as 1:2020cv02739
Petitioner: REESE KEITH
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEITH v. ZATECKY
as 1:2020cv02741
Petitioner: REESE L. KEITH
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEITH v. ZATECKY
as 1:2020cv02733
Petitioner: REESE KEITH
Respondent: DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?