Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sierra Club et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. and West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan and Adam Ortiz
Intervenor:
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and West Virginia Coal Association
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. v. Regan
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Ergon-West Virginia, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan
Allen et al v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen, Janet Allen, John Regan and others
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Chevron Midcontinent L.P., EQT Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Boddie v. Irviza et al
as 5:2021cv00207
Defendant:
Unit Manager R. Smith, Grand Prarie, A.W. Rich and others
Plaintiff:
Brendan Regan Boddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Regan v. Adams
as 3:2021cv00019
Respondent:
Warden Paul Adams
Petitioner:
Brian Patrick Regan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Regan et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv10032
Plaintiff:
Darlene Regan and Gary Prothascka
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regan v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv09750
Plaintiff:
Carol E. Regan
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regan et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv04119
Plaintiff:
Theresa Regan and Kenneth Regan
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regan v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv10250
Plaintiff:
Celeste Regan
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Homer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06408
Plaintiff:
Regan Homer and Matthew Homer
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
