Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Rumph v. Thomas et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Reggie Lee Rumph
Defendant:
Nurse Thomas and Nurse Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nylander et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Nylander, John Merrill Adams, JR, Russell Eugene Ahlberg and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Muhammad v. Hoover, City of et al
as 2:2022cv01626
Petitioner:
Baxter A Powell and Brother Bisnali R. A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Hoover, City of, Hoover Police Department, Hoover Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Streeter et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
Reggie Lee Duncan
Defendant:
William Streeter and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duncan v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00390
Plaintiff:
Reggie Lee Duncan
Defendant:
Lt. Walker, Sgt. Lindsey, C.O. Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Howard et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00745
Plaintiff:
Reggie Lee Duncan
Defendant:
Elizabeth T. Howard, Michael O. Calhoun and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Disability Act of 1990
Dunning v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2017cv00659
Plaintiff:
Reggie Dunning
Defendant:
Mohammad S Jenkins and Roderick Gadson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunning v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2016cv00110
Plaintiff:
Reggie Dunning
Defendant:
Mohamma Jenkins , Roderick L Gadson , Z Purdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
