Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Sierra et al v. Joan Bertoli Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05687
Defendant:
Patrick Phillips, Joan Bertoli, 1996 Corp. d/b/a International Wines; Jointly and Severally and others
Plaintiff:
Bernardino Sierra and Regino Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Regino v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv08518
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Asuncion Regino
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Perez v. Energy Fuel Cafe Inc.
as 1:2015cv03921
Defendant:
Vali Sonny Bari and Energy Fuel Cafe Inc.
Plaintiff:
Regino Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Dominguez v. Rock
as 1:2012cv03269
Petitioner:
Regino Dominguez
Respondent:
Superintendent David Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez et al v. John Doe Corporation A et al
as 1:2012cv02163
Plaintiff:
Regino Perez and Edgar Perez
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation A, John Doe Corporation B, Howard Chung and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez et al v. Granny Sayz LLC et al
as 1:2011cv08736
Plaintiff:
Regino Perez and Carlos Perez
Defendant:
Granny Sayz LLC, Healthalitious NYC Inc., Bennett Orfaly and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gomez-Martinez v. Moriarty Tree Service LTD. et al
as 7:2010cv09672
Plaintiff:
Regino Gomez-Martinez
Defendant:
Moriarty Tree Service LTD. and John P. Moriarty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ferreira v. New York Daily News et al
as 1:2008cv01520
Plaintiff:
Regino Ferreira
Defendant:
New York Daily News, Pete Donohue, The City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
