Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Naji v. Harbor Bay Real Estate Advisors, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Loren Naji
Defendant:
Harbor Bay Real Estate Advisors Advisors, LLC, Panzica Construction Co., Harbor Bay Real Estate Advisors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bronson v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bronson
Defendant:
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stanford v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Theresa Stanford
Defendant:
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Anderson v. Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority
as 3:2020cv00520
Counter Defendant:
Shawn Anderson
Defendant:
Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Arnold v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority et al
as 1:2020cv00318
Defendant:
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, SORTA and John Doe No. 1
Plaintiff:
Jordan B. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00389
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
