Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Bronson v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bronson
Defendant:
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Anderson v. Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority
as 3:2020cv00520
Counter Defendant:
Shawn Anderson
Defendant:
Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Arnold v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority et al
as 1:2020cv00318
Defendant:
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, SORTA and John Doe No. 1
Plaintiff:
Jordan B. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bench Billboard Company v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2019cv00701
Plaintiff:
Bench Billboard Company
Defendant:
Southwestern Ohio Transit Authority, City Of Cincinnati and South West Ohio Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ebert v. Amalgamated Transit Union et al
as 2:2019cv00283
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union and Steel Valley Regional Transit Authority
Plaintiff:
Renee Ebert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Halley v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
as 1:2017cv00732
Plaintiff:
William Halley
Defendant:
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00685
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
