Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Reeves v. Mason, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
Richard Kyle Reeves
Defendant:
Rene Mason, Tyrone Jenkins, L. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calloway v. Mason et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00311
Plaintiff:
Tyricka Lavon Calloway
Defendant:
Rene Mason, Jeremiah Thomas, Col. Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tigner v. Sparks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00954
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Tigner
Defendant:
Ms. Sparks, Danny Gould, Officer Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeves v. Siddiq et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2012cv00904
Plaintiff:
Richard Kyle Reeves
Defendant:
Lt. Scott, Tahir Siddiq, Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shapley v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00618
Plaintiff:
Shaun Glovis Shapley
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Mason et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00476
Plaintiff:
Brandon Howard
Defendant:
Rene Mason, J. C. Giles and Captain Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trantham v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Harvey Joe Trantham
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Sandra Giles, Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driskell v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00721
Plaintiff:
Carroll Joe Driskell
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones , Renee Mason , Sylvester Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlap v. Giles et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jermaine Dunlap
Defendant:
Sandra Giles, Rene Mason, Sylvester Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
