Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hardt v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Dale Everett Hardt
Defendant:
City of Portland, Scott Moede, Elsa Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardt v. City of Portland
as 3:2023cv01980
Plaintiff:
Dale Everett Hardt and Scott Whitish
Defendant:
City of Portland, Mingus Mapps, Ted Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rene Gonzalez v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Rene Gonzalez
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, Gulf Harbour Investments Corporation and Does 1 - 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Rene Gonzalez v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv01826
Plaintiff:
Rene Gonzalez
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, Gulf Harbour Investments Corporation and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
V.R.H. et al v. City of Indio et al
as 5:2020cv00748
Defendant:
City of Indio, Chief of Police Michael R. Washburn, Indio Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Renee Gonzalez and V. R. H.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
V.R.H. et al v. City of Indio et al
as 5:2019cv00806
Defendant:
City of Indio, Sergeant Sergeant Shannon, Cheif Of Police Michael R. Washburn and others
Plaintiff:
Minor V. R. H., Ms. Patricia Renee Gonzalez and V. R. H.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre Cooper et al v. DirecTV, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08097
Plaintiff:
Pierre Cooper, Rene Gonzalez, David Kondetti and others
Defendant:
DirecTV, Inc. and Directv, LLC
Lisa Rene Gonzalez v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 8:2014cv01634
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Lisa Rene Gonzalez
Gonzalez et al v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
as 2:2014cv00471
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven
Petitioner:
Jesus Rene Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
