Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Azar v. Renewal By Andersen, LLC
as 2:2024at00118
Plaintiff:
Farah Azar
Defendant:
Renewal By Andersen, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Azar v. Renewal By Andersen, LLC
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Farah Azar
Defendant:
Renewal By Andersen, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gallipeau v. Renewal by Andersen LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Dennis Gallipeau and Dennis M Gallipeau
Defendant:
Renewal by Andersen LLC and Window Replacement Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dreamstyle Remodeling, Inc. et al v. Renewal by Andersen LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Dreamstyle Remodeling of San Diego, Inc., Dreamstyle Remodeling of California LLC, Dreamstyle Remodeling, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Renewal by Andersen LLC and Andersen Corporation
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
GOLDIN v. RENEWAL BY ANDERSON LLC
as 2:2020cv06500
Plaintiff:
DR. PAUL GOLDIN
Defendant:
RENEWAL BY ANDERSEN LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Dreamstyle Remodeling, Inc. et al v. Renewal by Andersen, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01086
Plaintiff:
Dreamstyle Remodeling of Idaho, LLC and Dreamstyle Remodeling, Inc.
Defendant:
Andersen Corporation, Renewal by Andersen Corporation and Renewal by Andersen, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Dreamstyle Remodeling of California, Inc. v. Renewal By Andersen, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01324
Plaintiff:
Dreamstyle Remodeling of California, Inc.
Defendant:
Andersen Corporation, Renewal By Andersen Corporation and Renewal By Andersen, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Charvat v. The Southard Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv00190
Plaintiff:
Philip Charvat
Defendant:
The Southard Corporation and Renewal by Andersen LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
