Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ABRAMSON v. RESPOND POWER, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
STEWART N. ABRAMSON
Defendant:
RESPOND POWER, LLC and MAJOR ENERGY SERVICES, LLC each d/b/a MAJOR ENERGY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Major Energy Electric Services, LLC et al v. Horowitz et al
as 1:2019cv10431
Defendant:
Michael Baumann, Mark Wiederman, Saul Horowitz and others
Plaintiff:
Major Energy Services, LLC, National Gas & Electric, LLC, Major Energy Electric Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Horowitz v. Spark Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07534
Defendant:
Respond Power, LLC, Spark HoldCo, LLC, Major Energy Electric Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Saul Horowitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Wiederman v. Spark Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04564
Defendant:
Respond Power, LLC, Spark HoldCo, LLC, Major Energy Electric Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Wiederman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Barbara Gillis, et al v. Respond Power LLC
as 15-3877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA GILLIS, THOMAS GILLIS, SCOTT MCCLELLAND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RESPOND POWER LLC
Barbara Gillis, et al v. Respond Power LLC
as 15-8091
Petitioner:
BARBARA GILLIS, THOMAS GILLIS, SCOTT MCCLELLAND and others
Respondent:
RESPOND POWER LLC
CARRERA v. MAJOR ENERGY SERVICES, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv03208
Plaintiff:
RODRIGO CARRERA
Defendant:
MAJOR ENERGY SERVICES, LLC , RESPOND POWER, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GILLIS et al v. MAJOR ENERGY et al
as 2:2014cv03856
Plaintiff:
BARBARA GILLIS , THOMAS GILLIS , SCOTT R. and others
Defendant:
MAJOR ENERGY and RESPOND POWER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jacobs et al v. Major Enery Services LLC/Respond Power LLC et al
as 1:2012cv04842
Defendant:
Direct Sales Solutions LLC, Shai Fishman, Asher Fried and others
Plaintiff:
Delita Jacobs and Desmond Pouncie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
