Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DS et al v Rochester City School District et al
as 6:2019cv06528
Plaintiff:
R. Brian Goewey, CS and DS
Defendant:
Kim Garlock, Nancy Resto, Nicole McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kowlessar v. Resto et al
as 1:2019cv03324
Defendant:
Luck Resto and DI Trucking LLC
Plaintiff:
Wesley Kowlessar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gjekaj et al v. Shorehaven Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00817
Plaintiff:
Brandon Resto and Christopher Gjekaj
Defendant:
Shorehaven Homeowners Association, Inc., Vernon Alcoser, Will Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Appel et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11433
Plaintiff:
Moira Horan, Peter McNamara, Margaret McCormick and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Resto-Otero v.Auburn Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2018cv00824
Plaintiff:
Michael Resto-Otero
Defendant:
N.Y.S. DOCCS Auburn Correctional Facility, NYS DOCCS and Auburn Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Resto v. Joseph
as 9:2018cv00335
Respondent:
Joseph Joseph
Petitioner:
Iris Resto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Resto-Otero v. Doe et al
as 9:2017cv01115
Plaintiff:
Michael Resto-Otero
Defendant:
Elma Doe, Doe(s) and New York State DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Resto
as 1:2017cv02679
Plaintiff:
Ms. Zoraida Resto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
