Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Retcnick Fausten v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
as 24-10669
Plaintiff:
RETCNICK FAUSTEN
Defendant:
PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Fausten, Retcnick v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
as 9:2024cv80205
Plaintiff:
Retcnick Fausten
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Fausten, Retcnick, v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
as 9:2024cv80166
Plaintiff:
Fausten Retcnick and Retcnick Fausten
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Fausten v. Lantana Police Department et al
as 9:2022cv80657
Plaintiff:
Retcnick Fausten
Defendant:
Lantana Police Department and Delvis Santana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Retcnick Fausten v. AT&T Services Inc.
as 22-10096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RETCNICK FAUSTEN
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T SERVICES INC.
FAUSTEN v. AT&T SERVICES INC
as 4:2021cv00016
Plaintiff:
RETCNICK FAUSTEN
Defendant:
AT&T SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Retcnick Fausten v. AT&T Services Inc., et al
as 20-12734
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T SERVICES INC., BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RETCNICK FAUSTEN
FAUSTEN v. GEICO INDEMNINTY COMPANY
as 4:2019cv00618
Defendant:
GEICO INDEMNINTY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
RETCNICK FAUSTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAUSTEN v. AT&T SERVICES INC et al
as 4:2019cv00600
Defendant:
BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS LLC, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC and AT&T SERVICES INC
Plaintiff:
RETCNICK FAUSTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fausten v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv23383
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC and Sedgwick Claims Managements Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Retcnick Fausten
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0875
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
