Cases 1 - 10 of 26
In Re: Reuben Avent
as 21-1201
Respondent:
Danielle Barror, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Unknown Company Representatives and others
Petitioner:
Reuben Avent
In Re: Reuben Avent
as 21-1079
Respondent:
Target, Brian Cornell, Target CEO, Kerri Lee Loveland, NYS Dept. of Labor employee and others
Petitioner:
Reuben Avent
Avent v. Platinum Plus Auto Protection
as 21-574
Defendant / Appellee:
Palmer Administrative Services, Inc., PayLink Direct, Platinum Plus Auto Protection and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reuben Avent
Defendant:
Christina Strain
Avent v. Keybank et al
as 1:2021cv01466
Defendant:
Roberta Reardon, Kerri Loveland, Unknown Supervisor Jay of Key Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Reuben Avent
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Unknown NYS Dept. of Labor employees, and unknown Key Bank Rep.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Avent v. Keybank et al
as 1:2021cv01287
Plaintiff:
Reuben Avent
Defendant:
Keybank, Roberta Reardon, Kerri Loveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Avent v. Estervez et al
as 1:2020cv00908
Defendant:
Briggs, John Doe, P.O. Estervez and others
Plaintiff:
Reuben Avent
Respondent:
Anthony Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avent v. New York State Division of Parole
as 1:2020cv06275
Respondent:
New York State Division of Parole
Petitioner:
Reuben Avent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Avent v. Unknown Charity Assistant Atto
as 20-581
Defendant / Appellee:
Amber Bigica, P.O. Arthur, Unknown Charity Assistant Attorney Generals and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reuben Avent
Avent v. Estervez et al
as 1:2020cv01197
Defendant:
P.O. Briggs, P.O. Estervez, Unidentified P.O. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Reuben Avent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01565
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
