Cases 31 - 40 of 172
Reynoso Cruz v. Garland
as 21-126
Petitioner:
EMANUEL REYNOSO CRUZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Pena (Hector Raymond Pena)
as 21-1199
Defendant:
Elyn Reynoso, AKA BB, Jose Pena, AKA Chelo, Omar Flores and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Hector Raymond Pena, AKA C.O. Montana
United States v. Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
as 21-1886
Defendant / Appellant:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Hendrick Lucas v. WAMU Mortgage Pass Through Cer, et al
as 21-55385
Defendant / Appellee:
AILEENE JANEL REYNOSO, husband and wife, STACY L. NELSON, wife, STEVEN M. NELSON, husband and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENDRICK LUCAS
O. L. v. City of El Monte, et al
as 21-55246
Defendant:
JACKIE LACEY, CITY OF EL MONTE, MICHAEL BUCKHANNON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LILIANA JARA and RICHARD RUIZ
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O. L.
USA v. Lopez-Reynoso
as 21-50168
Defendant / Appellant:
Gustavo Adolfo Lopez-Reynoso, also known as Adolfo Lopez-Reynosa
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Yolanda Ramos-Mejia, et al v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-3186
Petitioner:
NANCY DANIELY REYNOSO-RAMOS, ISAIAS ISAAC REYNOSO-RAMOS and YOLANDA RAMOS-MEJIA
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Kohen Uhuru v. Jim Bonnifield, et al
as 21-55136
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK MOLONEY, license No. 181536, individual/official capacity, R. GOMEZ, CCI, individual/official capacity, J. STECK, Correctional Captain, individual/official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, AKA Diallo Dynomite, AKA Diallo Earl Uhuru
United States of America v. Pena (Jose Pena)
as 20-4192
Defendant:
Hector Raymond Pena, AKA C.O. Montana, Elyn Reynoso, AKA BB, Omar Flores and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Pena, AKA Chelo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
