Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cogley v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 24-1309
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COGLEY
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island Governor 2013-2015 in his official capacity, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Rhode Island Governor 2015-2021 in her official capacity and others
Silva v. Walrus and Carpenter Oysters, LLC
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Erik F Silva
Defendant:
Walrus and Carpenter Oysters, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Rhode Island Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Cogley v. State of Rhode Island
as 1:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Michael Cogley
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Rhode Island Department of Public Safety, Sergeant Michael Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Euell v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 22-1468
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ERIC EUELL
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND and RI ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, KEVIN GRACE, individually, and in his capacity as a member of the Rhode Island State Police, JEFFREY COLEMAN, individually, and in his capacity as a member of the Rhode Island State Police and others
Euell v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
Eric Euell
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Rhode Island Department of Public Safety, Rhode Island Depratment of Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Shabshelowitz v. State of Rhode Island Department of Public Safety, et al
as 1:2020cv00096
Plaintiff:
Harlan Shabshelowitz
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island Department of Public Safety, State Police and Lt. Michael Casey, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer employed by the State of Rhode Island, Lt. Michael Casey, Rhode Island State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
