Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Emhart Industries, Inc. v. New England Container Company, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2006cv00218
Plaintiff: Emhart Industries, Inc
Counter Claimant: New England Container Company, Inc, Black & Decker Inc., Organic Dyestuffs Corp. and others
Defendant: Providence Washington Insurance Company, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, United States Department of the Navy and others
Counter Defendant: United States Department of the Air Force
Cross Claimant: The United States of America and Black & Decker, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Induplate Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Univar USA, Inc. and others
4Th Party Plaintiff: BASF Corp.
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Black & Decker Inc
4Th Party Defendant: ConocoPhillips Company and Rohm and Haas Company
Cross Defendant: BNS, LLC
Not Classified By Court: Original Bradford Soap Works, Inc. n/k/a Bradford Soap International, Inc, Eastern Color & Chemical Co, Teknor-Apex and others
Petitioner: Rhodes Technologies, Inc., The Dow Chemical Company and Win Noren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
as 1:2021cv10598
Plaintiff: PURDUE PHARMA, LP, Rhodes Technologies and Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Defendant: Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant: ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant: NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee: US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party: DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
Municipality of Barceloneta v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2020cv01488
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Richard S. Sackler, Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Municipality of Barceloneta
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Cidra, Puerto Rico v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2020cv01290
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Richard S. Sackler, Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Municipality of Cidra, Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Adjuntas, Puerto Rico v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2020cv01291
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Richard S. Sackler, Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Municipality of Adjuntas, Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Villalba v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv01821
Defendant: McKESSON CORPORATION, Allergen Finance, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: MUNICIPALITY OF VILLALBA, PUERTO RICO and Municipality of Villalba
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Caguas v. Purdue Pharma Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01814
Defendant: McKESSON CORPORATION, RICHARD S. SACKLER, ANDA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: MUNICIPALITY OF CAGUAS, PUERTO RICO and Municipality of Caguas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Coamo, Puerto Rico v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv01819
Defendant: McKESSON CORPORATION, Allergen Finance, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: MUNICIPALITY OF COAMO, PUERTO RICO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Municipality of Ceiba, Puerto Rico v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv01818
Defendant: McKESSON CORPORATION, Allergen Finance, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff: MUNICIPALITY OF CEIBA, PUERTO RICO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?