Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Fisher v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Fisher and Rhonda D Fisher
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv02038
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rush v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv08200
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Rush
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Heinl et al v. NewRez LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01857
Plaintiff:
Marvin Heinl and Rhonda Heinl
Defendant:
NewRez LLC, Residential Funding Mortgage Securities I Incorporated Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-S10 and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Orso v. Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00020
Defendant:
Shara Andrews, Darren Miller, Trudy Gilmond and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Orso
Orso v. Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00018
Defendant:
Shara Andrews, Darren Miller, Trudy Gilmond and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Orso
Orso v. Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00015
Defendant:
Shara Andrews, Darren Miller, Trudy Gilmond and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Orso v. Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00017
Defendant:
Shara Andrews, Darren Miller, Trudy Gilmond and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Orso
Orso v. Disner et al
as 2:2021mc00019
Defendant:
Shara Andrews, Darren Miller, Trudy Gilmond and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Orso
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
