Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Ballesteros v. Diaz
as 1:2020cv24498
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. Ballesteros
Defendant:
Richard J. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv22193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ballesteros v. G.E.O. Group, I.N.C.
as 1:2020cv22018
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. Ballesteros
Defendant:
G.E.O. Group, I.N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballesteros v. Brown et al
as 1:2020cv22016
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. Ballesteros
Defendant:
Richard O.L. Brown, Wilfredo Ferrer and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballesteros v. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2020cv21389
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. Ballesteros
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballesteros v. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2018cv20608
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. Ballesteros
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ballesteros v. BCAP LLC Trust 2008-IND1
as 1:2018cv00896
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. Ballesteros
Defendant:
BCAP LLC Trust 2008-IND1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Ricardo Ballesteros, et al
as 17-15520
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
RICARDO AMADOR BALLESTEROS
Defendant - Appellant:
REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 6556 SKYLINE DRIVE, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 33446
Interested Party - Appellant:
ZENDA L. BALLESTER, Republica Argentina 76, 5to.14 Gandia, Valencia Spain
Ballesteros v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
as 3:2017cv02856
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A Ballesteros
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Ricardo Ballesteros
as 17-12293
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party - Appellant:
RICARDO AMADOR BALLESTEROS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
