Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv07343
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
USA v. Ricardo Aguilar-Gonzalez
as 17-60493
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICARDO AGUILAR-GONZALEZ, also known as Ritchie
Aguilar v. ATS Specialized, Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00098
Defendant:
ATS Specialized, Inc and Robert P Kozak
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alfonso Cavada, et al v. City of Chicago
as 13-2497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO CAVADA, PATRICIA CAVADA and RICARDO AGUILAR
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cavada et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv01916
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Cavada , Patricia Cavada and Ricardo Aguilar
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Gonzalez, Salgado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Aguilar v. Investaid Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00643
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Aguilar, Jr.
Defendant:
Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, CitiMortgage, Inc., Investaid Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Aguilar v. Keppel AmFELS, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv00176
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Aguilar
Defendant:
Keppel AmFELS, Inc. and AMTEX General Contractors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguilar et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00813
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Aguilar and Marigela Aguilar
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ricardo Aguilar-Varillas, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-72292
Petitioner:
RICARDO AGUILAR-VARILLAS, ESCOLASTICA AGUILAR DE AGUILAR and ZULEIKA AGUILAR-AGUILAR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Ricardo Aguilar-Varillas, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-70556
Petitioner:
RICARDO AGUILAR-VARILLAS, ESCOLASTICA AGUILAR DE AGUILAR and ZULEIKA AGUILAR-AGUILAR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
