Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Richmond v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2026cv02114
Plaintiff:
Lisa Richmond
Defendant:
Scott County, Dakota County, Rice County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
C.G. v. USD 405 Rice County, Kansas et al
as 6:2026cv01003
Plaintiff:
C. G.
Defendant:
USD 405 Rice County, Kansas, Sharee Madsen and Jonathan Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. Rice County, Kansas
as 5:2025cv03215
Plaintiff:
Raymon Levi Hunter
Defendant:
Rice County, Kansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richmond v. State of Minnesota et al
as 1:2025cv00671
Plaintiff:
Lisa Richmond
Defendant:
Judge Charles Webber, Judge Michael Wetzell, Grant Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lechtenberg v. Rice County et al
as 0:2025cv02739
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lechtenberg
Defendant:
Rice County, Jesse Thomas, Jillian Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Katakis v. Rice County Social Services et al
as 0:2025cv02062
Plaintiff:
Vasilios Katakis
Defendant:
Rice County Social Services, Daniel Martinez, Skylar Lindemuth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lasley v. Neumann et al
as 0:2024cv01476
Plaintiff:
Edward Evan Lasley
Defendant:
Neumann, Mohamed, Rice County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Evans
as 5:2022cv03269
Petitioner:
Garrett Miller
Respondent:
Rice County, Kansas and Bryant Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elson v. Evans
as 5:2022cv03266
Petitioner:
Michael Elson
Respondent:
Rice County Jail and Bryant Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
