Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Islam v. Phegley et al
as 4:2021cv00551
Plaintiff:
Abdul Islam and Keith L. Kelly
Defendant:
Jason Pulliam, Matt Ramon, Amy Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winebarger v. Corizon, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04072
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Winebarger
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, John/Jane Doe #1, John/Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winebarger v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04046
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Winebarger
Defendant:
Corizon LLC , Alfred G Garcia , Conrad Balcer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winebarger v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Winebarger
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Alfred G. Garcia, Conrad S. Balcer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillette v. USA
as 6:2013cv03329
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard B. Gillette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pritchett v. Wallace et al
as 1:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Eric Pritchett
Defendant:
Ian Wallace, Unknown Wigfall, Clifton Cossey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thexton v. Nixon et al
as 4:2012cv01180
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Thexton, Jr
Defendant:
Jeremiah Jay Nixon, Richard B Teitelman, Lisa White Hardwick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oplinger v. Russell
as 4:2011cv01113
Petitioner:
Richard B. Oplinger
Respondent:
Terry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Millennium Bank et al
as 4:2010mc00752
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Millennium Bank
Receiver:
Richard B. Roper
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Millennium Bank et al
as 4:2010mc09039
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Millennium Bank, United Trust of Switzerland S.A., UT of S, LLC and others
Receiver:
Richard B. Roper, III
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
