Cases 41 - 50 of 108
In Re: Sylvester Traylor
as 12-672
Petitioner:
Sylvester Traylor
Respondent:
Bassam Awwa, M.D., Donald Leone, Attorney, Chinigo Leone & Maruzo LLP, City of New London and others
Oliphant v. McGill
as 11-4654
Petitioner - Appellant:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Respondent - Appellee:
Jeffrey McGill, Warden and Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut Attorney General
Oliphant v. Quiro
as 11-3279
Petitioner - Appellant:
Anthony Wayne Oliphant
Respondent - Appellee:
Angel Quiros and Richard Blumenthal, CT Atty Gen
Nowacki v. Malloy et al
as 3:2011cv01242
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nowacki
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Andrew McDonald, Michael Lawlor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Book v. Bysiewicz
as 11-2739
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ethan Book, Jr. and Ethan Book for U.S. Senate
Defendant / Appellee:
Susan Bysiewicz, Gayle S. Slossberg, James F. Spallone and others
Book v. Bysiewicz
as 11-2739
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ethan Book and Ethan Book for U.S. Senate
Defendant - Appellee:
Susan Bysiewicz, Gayle S. Slossberg, James F. Spallone and others
Book v. Bysiewicz
as 11-2307
Petitioner:
Ethan Book and Ethan Book for U.S. Senate
Respondent:
Susan Bysiewicz, Gayle S. Slossberg, James F. Spallone and others
Matthews v. Blumenthal et al.
as 11-1734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andrew N. Matthews, Sergeant
Defendant:
Richard Blumenthal
Defendant - Appellee:
Edward Lynch, Col., Christopher Arciero, Major, William Podgorski, Lt. and others
Twitty v. Ashcroft
as 11-448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andre J. Twitty
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, H. Lappin, Dir, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ind, G.L. Herschberger, Regional Dir, BOP, Ind and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bureau of Prisons and Salius, CT Dept of Corr, Ind
Traylor v. Awwa et al
as 3:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Traylor
Defendant:
Bassam Awwa, Donald Leone, City of New London and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
