Cases 1 - 8 of 8
(HC) Watkins v. People of the State of California
as 2:2023cv02060
Petitioner:
Richard Howard Watkins
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard et al v. City of Newark et al
as 4:2022cv06154
Plaintiff:
Lenika Howard, Rameia Appleton, Khaylum Richard-Howard and others
Defendant:
City of Newark, T Nobbe, A Musantry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howard et al v. City of San Francisco et al
as 4:2022cv05243
Plaintiff:
Lenika Howard, Rameia Appleton, Khaylum Richard-Howard and others
Defendant:
City of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, Eduard Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(HC) Watkins v. 3rd District Appellate Court
as 2:2022cv01575
Petitioner:
Richard Howard Watkins
Respondent:
3rd District Appellate Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Watkins v. USA
as 2:2022cv01158
Petitioner:
Richard Howard Watkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Gorell, Jr. et al
as 3:2015cv01589
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard Howard Gorell, Jr., John Stephen Graham and 8 Ball Tavern, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Communications Act of 1994
Ramon Pineda et al v. Richard Howard et al
as 8:2009cv00880
Plaintiff:
Ramon Pineda and Parmanand Kumar
Defendant:
Richard Howard, William Ring, James R Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Type:
Other Statutes
Howard v. Wells Fargo Financial Acceptance
as 3:2007cv05881
Plaintiff:
Richard Howard
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Financial Acceptance
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
