Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Hospital Housekeeping Systems (HHS) et al
as 6:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Hospital Housekeeping Systems (HHS), Palestine Regional Medical Center, Regina Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Zelle et al
as 6:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Zelle and Capital One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gibson v. Devall Towing & Boat Service of Hackberry, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv01155
Plaintiff:
Fred Gibson
Defendant:
Devall Towing & Boat Service of Hackberry, LLC, Devall Towing & Boat Service, Inc., Devall Offshore Barge Line, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 883 Jones Act
Randle v. Travis County, Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00227
Defendant:
Sally Hernandez, M. Gallo, Travis County Jail Inmate Trust Funds and others
Plaintiff:
Richard James Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Travis County, Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
Sally Hernandez, M. Gallo, John Doe et al and others
Plaintiff:
Richard James Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00516
Plaintiff:
Richard James Jackson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2020cv00237
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Richard James Randle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Franco et al
as 7:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Michael E Rutledge, Warden A Franco and TDCJ Executive Director
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
