Cases 1 - 10 of 25
US v. Richard Bates
as 23-4248
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE BATES
Bates v. New York Parole et al
as 1:2020cv06818
Respondent:
New York Parole, New York Police Department and New York Supreme Court Part 721
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Bates, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254
Bates v. Superintendent
as 9:2020cv00864
Respondent:
Superintendent
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bates v. New York Parole et al
as 1:2020cv03986
Respondent:
New York Parole and New York Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Bates, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bates v. Jhon F. Kenndy Air Port Police Department
as 1:2018cv09211
Defendant:
Jhon F. Kenndy Air Port Police Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Bates, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Clinton Correctional Facility
as 1:2018cv06375
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Bates
Defendant:
Clinton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Manhattan New York Supreme Court et al
as 4:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Bates, Jr
Defendant:
Manhattan New York Supreme Court, Robert M Stolze and Cyrus R Vance , Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Clinton Correctional Facility
as 4:2018cv00238
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Bates, Jr
Respondent:
Clinton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bates v. New York City Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv07797
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Bates
Defendant:
New York City Police Department, Rikers Island, New York State Jail, Great Meadows Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Manhattan, NY Supreme Court et al
as 1:2017cv07435
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Bates
Defendant:
Manhattan, NY Supreme Court, R. M. Stolze, New York Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
