Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Canterbury v. CoreCivic/Central Arizona Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv02081
Defendant:
CoreCivic/Central Arizona Detention Center and United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Canterbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canterbury v. USA
as 2:2018cv01800
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Canterbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Richard Canterbury
as 18-10319
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE CANTERBURY, AKA Richard Canterbery
USA v. Richard Canterbury
as 18-10115
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE CANTERBURY, AKA Richard Canterbery
Richard Canterbury v. Clark County Detention Center, et al
as 17-17000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE CANTERBURY
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and LOMBARDO, Clark County Sheriff
Canterbury v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Canterbury
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center and Clark County Sheriff Lombardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canterbury v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Canterbury
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center and Clark County Sheriff Lombardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Canterbury v. Craig Walker, et al
as 14-15040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE CANTERBURY, AKA Richard Canterbery
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG WALKER, Detective, City of Phoenix and UNKNOWN TURNER, Detective, # 764, City of Phoenix
Richard Canterbury v. USA
as 13-17015
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD LEE CANTERBURY, AKA Richard Canterbery
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richard Lee Canterbury v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv07216
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Canterbury
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
