Cases 101 - 110 of 273
Parks v. Ryan et al
as 3:2018cv08084
Petitioner:
Edward F Parks
Respondent:
Charles Ryan, Richard Pratt and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cox v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv01177
Plaintiff:
Walter John Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Carla Hacker-Agnew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward F. Parks v. Charles Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv02953
Respondent:
Department Of Corrections, Richard Pratt and Charles Ryan
Petitioner:
Edward F Parks
Rogers v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
James Eldon Rogers
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Corizon Health Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coppess v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
Wellington Spencer Coppess
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Corizon Correctional Health Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00481
Plaintiff:
Patrick Newman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Kevin Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jobe v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
William L Jobe
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Corizon Health Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres-Montes v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres-Montes
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Corizon Health, Leo Easley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Neuendorf, II v. Unknown Parties, et al
as 17-17557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN NEUENDORF II, AKA J. Neuendorf, AKA John Calvin Neuendorf
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: Unknown Partys at Lewis Prison, DANIEL WILLIAMS, ROBERT TRIAS, Corrections Officer III at ASPC Lewis and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
