Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Munoz v. Smelser
as 1:2009cv02367
Plaintiff:
Mario Rivera Munoz
Defendant:
Richard Smelser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valdez v. Smelser
as 1:2009cv02203
Petitioner:
Nicholas Valdez
Respondent:
Richard Smelser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saenz v. Smelser et al
as 1:2009cv01948
Petitioner:
Horacio Arraz Saenz
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Smelser et al
as 1:2009cv01290
Petitioner:
Connie Ray Powell
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and John Suther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valdez v. Smelser
as 1:2009cv00888
Petitioner:
Nicholas Valdez
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bellin v. Smelser, et al
as 08-1395
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. BELLIN
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD SMELSER, Warden and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Hassler v. Smelser, et al
as 08-1388
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE E. HASSLER
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD SMELSER, Warden and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, (Actually named as: The Attorney General of the State of Colorado)
Bellin v. Smelser et al
as 1:2008cv01478
Petitioner:
Christopher J. Bellin
Respondent:
Richard Smelser and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hassler v. Smelser et al
as 1:2008cv01168
Petitioner:
Clarence E. Hassler
Respondent:
Colorado Attorney General and Richard Smelser
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spatziani v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2007cv01254
Defendant:
Kenneth (I) Baylor, David (I) Sachette, Richard Smelser and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Spatziani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
