Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Harpe v. Lawler et al
as 1:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A Harpe
Defendant:
Tom Lawler, Wendy Mann and Richard T Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harpe v. Lawler et al
as 1:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A. Harpe
Defendant:
Tom Lawler, Richard T. Alexander and Wendy Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warth v. Powell et al
as 1:2020cv03559
Respondent:
Richard T. Alexander, Jr., William Brogdon, Butch Conway and others
Petitioner:
David Warth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Modi v. Alexander
as 1:2019cv05619
Plaintiff:
Girish Modi
Defendant:
Richard T. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Beyers et al
as 1:2018cv03069
Plaintiff:
Quaris LeQuahn Holland
Defendant:
Karen E. Beyers, John Batchelor, Sandra C. Gerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunson v. Schrader et al
as 1:2018cv02157
Plaintiff:
Thashaggi Ashley Chavis Brunson
Defendant:
Kathryn M. Schrader, Brandon Delfunt, Lou Solts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift Bey v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv00906
Plaintiff:
Blaane Marco Swift Bey
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Christopher M. Carr, Richard T. Hamil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Rite Aid of Georgia, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00946
Plaintiff:
Coleman and Donald M. Coleman
Defendant:
Rite Aid of Georgia, Inc. and Richard T. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Wimbush v. Gwinnett Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2016cv00820
Plaintiff:
Therian Wimbush
Defendant:
Gwinnett Judicial Circuit, Gwinnett County Office of the District Attorney, Dan W. Mayfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. Batchelor et al
as 1:2015cv04422
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Mosby
Defendant:
Ronnie K. Batchelor, Marlene Zekser, Richard T. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
