Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Richardson v. Gerlach
as 0:2018cv03499
Defendant:
Chuck Gerlach
Plaintiff:
Ebonie Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Gerlach
as 0:2018cv02937
Plaintiff:
Ebonie Richardson
Defendant:
Chuck Gerlach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickner v. Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Lance Wickner
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Shelby R. Richardson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Johnson Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Benson
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, Shelby Richardson, Kevin Moser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fageroos v. Richardson et al
as 0:2016cv04230
Plaintiff:
Richard Fageroos, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby Richardson, Kevin Moser, Blake Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble et al v. Minnesota State-Operated Services et al
as 0:2016cv02720
Plaintiff:
David Le Roy Gamble, Jr., Cyrus Patrick Gladden, II, David James Jannetta and others
Defendant:
Minnesota State-Operated Services , Minnesota State Industries , Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stabnow v. Johnson-Piper et al
as 0:2016cv02648
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Stabnow
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper , Shelby Richardson , Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, The Institute For Psychological & Sexual Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wills v. Jesson et al
as 0:2013cv01973
Plaintiff:
Wesley Elmer Wills
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Kevin Moser, Scott Benoit and others
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
