Cases 1 - 10 of 240
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner:
DAQUWON RICHARDSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Richardson v. Menard Inc
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joyce A Richardson
Defendant:
Menard Inc doing business as Menards
Other:
Galen Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. SMALL et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
CORY MARTEZ SMITH
Defendant:
GARY SMALL, JESSICA RICHARDSON, CASSANDRA POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TREY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, BRANDY LEEK, ANTHONY BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAGG v. TIERNEY et al
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
JUAN JOSEPH FLAGG
Defendant:
S. TIERNEY, RICHARDSON and C. POPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
CODY A. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RICHARDSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv02306
Plaintiff:
SANDRA RICHARDSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AUTUMN E. CORDELLIONE A.K.A. JONATHAN C. RICHARDSON v. COMMISSIONER OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
AUTUMN E. CORDELLIONE A.K.A. JONATHAN C. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
