Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ketchum et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ricky Lee Ketchum, Mrs. Debra A Ketchum, Debra A Ketchum and others
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICE et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00542
Plaintiff:
RICKY LEE RICE and ASHLEY RICE
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv02918
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CHAMBERS, SPEARS and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY LEE ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. WARDEN
as 2:2018cv00356
Petitioner:
RICKY LEE RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ALLEN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02573
Petitioner:
RICKY LEE ALLEN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02555
Petitioner:
RICKY LEE ALLEN
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCHIESSLER et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv01234
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
NU HUYNH and RICKI LEE SCHIESSLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Fries et al
as 1:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Allen
Defendant:
Kenneth C Fries, Carla Jackson and Jennifer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUST v. PYKE et al
as 1:2014cv00352
Defendant:
LAURA M. CLOUSER, THOMAS R LETT, NOLAN D. PYKE and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY LEE RUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rust v. Pyke et al
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Rust
Defendant:
Nolan D Pyke, Laura M Clouser, Thomas R Lett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
