Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Jeffrey Reiher v. Robert Johnson, et al
as 20-2231
Defendant / Appellee:
B. TROWBRIDGE, Librarian, ROBERT JOHNSON, Inspector and DONALD RICUMSTRICT, Deputy Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY REIHER
Reiher v. Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv12722
Defendant:
B. Trowbridge, Donald Ricumstrict and Robert Johnson
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Reiher
D'Andre Alexander v. Ann Hoffman, et al
as 20-1618
Defendant:
RANDALL VANSUMERAN, DONALD RICUMSTRICT, DELARDON THOMAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D'ANDRE ALEXANDER
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTTY FREED and ANN HOFFMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv10581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gaither v. Thompson et al
as 2:2019cv13398
Defendant:
Thompson, Devyn L. Simmons, Pankhurst and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Gaither
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv13118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Andre Alexander v. Ann Hoffman, et al
as 19-2161
Defendant:
RANDALL VANSUMERAN, DONALD RICUMSTRICT, DELARDON THOMAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D'ANDRE ALEXANDER
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTTY FREED and ANN HOFFMAN
David Galeski v. Donald Ricumstrict, et al
as 19-2128
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD RICUMSTRICT, [UNKNOWN] ENDERS, Prison Counselor, Gus Harrison Correctional Facility and [UNKNOWN] THOMAS, RUM, Gus Harrison Correctional Facility
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID GALESKI
Kevin Theriot v. Daniel LeSatz, et al
as 19-1278
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] HOFFNER, ARUS, OFFICER GOSS, DONALD RICUMSTRICT, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN DWAYNE THERIOT
Bryant #590718 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00215
Defendant:
Unknown Edmond, Unknown Jacobsen, Unknown Tanner and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Bryant #590718
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
