Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Maximo Plaza Inc. v. Miracle Mile Industries, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03285
Plaintiff:
Maximo Plaza Inc.
Defendant:
Miracle Mile Industries, LLC, Lauren Ridley and Does 1 to 10
DIANAIN LLC v. RIDLEY
as 2:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
DIANAIN LLC
Defendant:
KENNETH RIDLEY
Interested Party:
HAROLD SAFRIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
David Ridley Oil, LLC v. Silver Creek Oil and Gas, LLC
as 6:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
David Ridley Oil, LLC
Defendant:
Silver Creek Oil and Gas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven L. Ridley et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2016cv00339
Defendant:
Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP, Does and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Geraldine R. Ridley and Steven L. Ridley
United States of America v. Ball et al
as 4:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeremy R. Ball and Reynese F. Ridley
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1703 Default of HUD Loan
Alan D. Ridley v. Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08833
Defendant:
Does, Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. and Sage Point Lender Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Alan D. Ridley
Melba Ridley v. Michael Donohue et al
as 5:2014cv02309
Defendant:
Does, Michael Donohue, Jason Friedman and others
Plaintiff:
Melba Ridley
Phyllis M Chestang v. Lee Baca et al
as 2:2012cv07227
Defendant:
1755 Morada Place, Michael D Antonovich, Lee Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M Chestang
Ridley v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 1:2011cv00295
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Ridley
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
