Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ridley v. Gaffney et al
as 1:2021cv00997
Defendant:
Errin Gaffney, Nurse C. Nickles and Dr. Michelle Dube
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Ridley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridley v. Town of Yemassee et al
as 9:2020cv03054
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Town of Yemassee and Town of Yemassee Police Department
Plaintiff:
Justin J Ridley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridley v. Budz et al
as 1:2018cv02716
Plaintiff:
Richard Ridley
Defendant:
Mark Davis, Timothy Budz, Dr. Christopher Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ridley v. Correct Care et al
as 1:2018cv02398
Defendant:
Correct Care, Jared Anderson, Captain G. Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ridley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ridley v. McGill et al
as 1:2015cv01612
Plaintiff:
Richard David Ridley
Defendant:
John McGill, Warden Stevenson, Holly Scaturo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Ridley v. Scott Lowery Law Office PC
as 2:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
Charles B Ridley, III
Defendant:
Scott Lowery Law Office PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ridley v. Law Offices of Harold E Scherr PA
as 3:2011cv02696
Plaintiff:
Charles B Ridley, III
Defendant:
Law Offices of Harold E Scherr PA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ridley v. Law Office of Larry Roach, The
as 3:2011cv02407
Plaintiff:
Charles B Ridley, III
Defendant:
Law Office of Larry Roach, The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ridley v. Pickens County et al
as 3:2008cv01781
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen Ridley
Defendant:
Pickens County, Mary Francis Hartman and Sheriff Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Campbell v. Gardner et al
as 6:2007cv03106
Plaintiff:
Darlene Ridley Campbell and Darlene Ridley Campbell
Defendant:
Steven R Gardner, Southeastern Neurosurgical and Spine Institute PA, Naveen Parti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
