Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04396
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv06221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00898
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jablonski et al v. Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00840
Plaintiff: Geralyn Jablonski and People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Geralyn Jablonski
Defendant: Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd. , Riexinger & Associates, LLC and Baker & Miller, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00091
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GOODMAN et al v. RIEXINGER & ASSOCIATES, LLC
as 2:2010cv00217
Plaintiff: KAY GOODMAN and KEVIN GOODMAN
Defendant: RIEXINGER & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00335
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02887
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02089
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Scanlan v. Riexinger & Associates, LLC
as 2:2007cv00041
Plaintiff: John Scanlan and John Scanlan
Defendant: Riexinger & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?