Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00888
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
ROE v. LAKEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2020cv07681
Defendant: LBOE PRESIDENT MOSHE BENDER, SUPERVISOR OF STEM AND CHAPTER 192/193 MALKA SPITZ-STEIN, LAKEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION and others
Plaintiff: RITA ROE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Roman-Delgado et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv02918
Plaintiff: Franceska Roman-Delgado , A.C.D. and Madeline Ruth Mills-Bruno
Defendant: John Doe, Jane Doe, Ricardo Mayoral-Del Valle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris & Morris, PSC, et al v. Gayle Slaughter, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5501
Plaintiff: KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: MORRIS & MORRIS P.S.C.
Defendant - Appellee: LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, Individually and official capacity, JAMES AMATO and others
Keith Guy, Sr., et al v. LFUCG, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5496
Plaintiff: KEITH RENE GUY, SR., on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated, BARRY LYNN DEMUS, JR., CHRISTOPHER ANDRE WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant: JOHN DOE IV #1-#37, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JANE DOE IV #1- #6, on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class, JOHN DOE II #1-33 (EXCEPTING #5, 9, 21, 26 & 27), on behalf of themselves and other similarly-situated, but as yet unknown, John Doe and Jane Doe victims, as a class and others
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: REX ROE #48, #62, #91, #97, #103, On behalf of themselves and all others who are similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: LEXINGTON FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, fka The City Of Lexington, H. FOSTER PETTIT, in official and individual capacity, JAMES AMATO, Individually and others
Crespo et al v. Allan Spear Construction Puerto Rico, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01323
Plaintiff: Jose Angel Crespo-Aviles , Sokunthea Yeider-Crespo , Conjugal Partership Crespo-Yeider and others
Defendant: Allan Spear Construction Puerto Rico, LLC, State Insurance Fund Corporation (SIFC), Entity "X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv07430
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RODRIGUEZ et al v. BALKISSOON et al
as 2:2010cv01618
Plaintiff: LUIS G. RODRIGUEZ and YESENIA JIMENEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant: RAMNARINE BALKISSOON, GREGORY A. FINNING , BAKER AND COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01271
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00792
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?