Cases 41 - 50 of 340
Rivera v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00852
Plaintiff:
Angel Rivera
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Lisette Rivera
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of SSA Decision DIWC - Title II Worker or Child Claims
Rivera v. Reese
as 3:2022cv00654
Plaintiff:
Andres Rivera
Defendant:
Jennie Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. USA
as 3:2022cv00576
Petitioner:
Carlos F. Rivera
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Perea et al v. Industrial Pallet, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
Raymundo Aguilera Zamudio, Francisco Gonzalez, Hugo Ros and others
Defendant:
Randy Therrien, Industrial Pallet, LLC, Joseph O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Santiago Rivera v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Rosa Santiago Rivera
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Rivera v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christina O Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Admin and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Carlos, Ned McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
