Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KAUFMAN v. RIVER EDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER et al
as 5:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
HEATHER KAUFMAN
Defendant:
RIVER EDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER and RIVER EDGE FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY v. TWIN RIVERS LAND & TIMBER INC et al
as 1:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
International Paper Company
Defendant:
TWIN RIVERS LAND & TIMBER, INC., TWIN RIVERS COMPANY, INC., TWIN RIVERS LAND & TIMBER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOROHAN v. RIVERS EDGE TREESTANDS INC
as 3:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sorohan
Defendant:
Rivers Edge Treestands, Inc. and RIVERS EDGE TREESTANDS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
JONES v. CLARK et al
as 3:2020cv00116
Plaintiff:
RIVER BOYD JONES
Defendant:
SHERIFF MELVIN ANDREWS, CAPTAIN SHANNON YOUNG, MAJOR LARRY CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PATEL et al v. AKBRUDIN
as 7:2019cv00188
Defendant:
DAVIS HARRIS, CHARLES M WALKER, VISHNU SUTARIA and others
Not Classified By Court:
NARENDRA MODI and EVA M LAMEH
Plaintiff:
KRISHNA PATEL and VIJAY PATEL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
