Cases 61 - 70 of 91
Sourdiff v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
Russell M. Sourdiff, II
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail, Dr. Boakye, Nurse Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hewlett v. Riverside Regional Jail Authority
as 1:2014cv01352
Plaintiff:
Adonis Hewlett
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Riverside Regional Jail et al
as 3:2014cv00692
Plaintiff:
John O. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail and Chesterfield Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aquino v. Newcome et al
as 2:2014cv00502
Plaintiff:
Andrew P. Aquino
Defendant:
Jeffery Newcome and Riverside Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Newscome et al
as 1:2014cv01257
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Green
Defendant:
Jeffery Newscome, Bonkye Medical Director, Riverside Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Trinity Food Service Group et al
as 1:2014cv00831
Plaintiff:
Damariole Brown
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service Group, L. Colonel Jeffery Newton and Riverside Regional Jail Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pritchett v. Ryhenn (Riverside Regional Jail) et al
as 2:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Ashley L. Pritchett
Defendant:
Ryhenn (Riverside Regional Jail) and Nurse Ryhenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keon Hill v. Carter
as 13-6400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEON S. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARTER, Officer/ Petersburg Police Officer
Defendant:
EVANS, Nurse, ABASHI, Dr. Chief Doctor at Riverside Jail, CYRIAX, Ms. Chief Physican Medical Dept and others
Finney v. Riverside Regional Jail
as 3:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
Philip Finney
Defendant:
Riverside Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Davis v. Nick Sample
as 13-6153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE UNIQUE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
NICK SAMPLE, Officer, Badge #91, Jail Officer, Riverside Regional Jail and NURSE ELLIOTT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
