Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lewis v. Riverview, City of et al
as 5:2023cv12531
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Gail Lewis
Defendant:
Riverview, City of, Matthew Lyles and Michael McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson v. Whorly et al
as 2:2018cv14047
Defendant:
Arron Whorly, Riverview, City of and Ron Miller
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ferguson
Shaw v. Riverview City of et al
as 2:2018cv13830
Defendant:
Douglas Drysdale, Riverview City of, Gary Chevillet and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shaw v. Riverview, City of et al
as 2:2016cv11693
Plaintiff:
Craig Shaw
Defendant:
Riverview, City of , Gary Chevillet , Douglas Drysdale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Superior Communications, d/b/a Smile FM v. Riverview City of
as 2:2015cv13363
Plaintiff:
Superior Communications, d/b/a Smile FM
Defendant:
Riverview City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Portillo-Dowdy et al v. Riverview, City of et al
as 2:2014cv12469
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Portillo-Dowdy and Malhia Rehman
Defendant:
Riverview, City of , Clifford Rosenbohm , Michael P. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. Officer Kevin Reif et al
as 2:2014cv10625
Plaintiff:
James Scott and Helen Scott
Defendant:
Officer Kevin Reif , Lieutenant Ray Collins, City of Redford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv10485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cameron v. Riverview, City of et al
as 2:2010cv14098
Plaintiff:
Daniel Laidlaw Cameron
Defendant:
Riverview, City of, Michael Hurley, Dean Workman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
