Cases 31 - 40 of 494
(PC) Haggerty v. St. Andre
as 2:2023cv02943
Plaintiff:
Lee E. Haggerty
Defendant:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haggerty v. St. Andre
as 3:2023cv06463
Plaintiff:
Lee E. Haggerty
Defendant:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winslow v. Macomber et al
as 3:2023cv02270
Petitioner:
Kellen B. Winslow, II
Respondent:
Jeffery McComber and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PS) Johnson v. El Dorado County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv02843
Defendant:
Alling & Jillson, LTD, El Dorado County Superior Court, David L. DeVore and others
Plaintiff:
Kent Knox Johnson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States of America v. Rob Mikitarian
as 2:2023cv10183
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Rob Mikitarian
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
(PC) Hammler v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Defendant:
Sacramento County, City of Represa, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwinell, LLC et al v. McCullough et al
as 2:2023cv10029
Plaintiff:
Dwinell, LLC and Buckel Family Wine LLC
Defendant:
Joseph McCullough and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Ramirez v. Pratt
as 3:2023cv02175
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Gary Esquivel v. Rob St. Andre
as 2:2023cv09946
Petitioner:
Daniel Gary Esquivel
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv05783
Plaintiff:
Garred F. Norman
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Rob Bonta, Ruben Duran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
