Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Chatman v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01314
Plaintiff:
Paul Chatman
Defendant:
Rob L Jeffreys, Brendan F Kelly and Craig Findley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kevin Tolliver v. Keith Foley, et al
as 22-3382
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH J. FOLEY, Warden, STANLEY TAYLOR, MATTHEW CHRISTLER and others
Williams v. Jeffreys
as 3:2022cv50017
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Williams
Defendant:
Rob L. Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Greene et al
as 1:2021cv02835
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Kwame Y Raoul, Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Tolliver v. Keith Foley, et al
as 21-3250
Defendant / Appellee:
ABDUL RAHMAN SHAHID, ROCHELLE MOORE, KEITH J. FOLEY, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Roy Durham, Jr. v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 19-3932
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN REESE, Corrections Officer, JUSTIN JOHNSON, Case Manager, JOSEPH LITTLE, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
RUDOLPH PRINGLES, Deputy Warden of Operations, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY A. DURHAM, JR.
Kevin Tolliver v. Emma Collins, et al
as 19-3761
Defendant / Appellee:
ABDUL RAHMAN SHAHID, JOHN AND JANE DOE, Staff and Administrators, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, ROCHELLE MOORE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN A. TOLLIVER
Roy Durham, Jr. v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 17-3636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DURHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROB L. JEFFREYS, Warden, Chief, Bureau of Classification, MICHAEL SHEETS, Warden, W.C.I., JUSTIN JOHNSON, Case Manager and others
Roy Durham, Jr. v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 17-3007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DURHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, ROB L. JEFFREYS, Warden, L C COVAL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
