Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Morrison v. Davis
as 1:2018cv11349
Plaintiff:
Cathy Morrison
Defendant:
Robert Glenn Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. DAVOL, INC., et al
as 1:2011cv03662
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. DAVIS
Defendant:
DAVOL INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis, et al v. US
as 11-2256
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN M. MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
Interested Party:
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
OLGA DAVIS, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Debra Davis
Litif, et al v. US
as 11-2255
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANNA M. LITIF, individually, and in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis R. Litif, LUANNE LITIF, LEE LITIF and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOHN M. MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Interested Party:
PETER GELZINIS, SUFFOLK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and MARION HUSSEY, in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey
Davis, et al v. US, et al
as 10-2369
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
:
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEYS FOR THE SUFFOLK, NORFOLK, AND MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS OF MASSACHUSETTS
Litif, et al v. United State
as 10-1472
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis, ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis, MARION HUSSEY, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNA M. LITIFF, individually, and in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis R. Litif, LUANNE LITIF and LEE LITIF
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JOHN J. CONNOLLY, JOHN M. MORRIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
:
, and
Davis, et al v. US, et al
as 10-1465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis
Plaintiff:
OLGA DAVIS, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Debra Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
:
and
Davis, et al v. US
as 10-1419
Plaintiff:
OLGA DAVIS, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Debra Davis
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis and ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
H. PAUL RICO, JOHN MORRIS, JOHN CONNOLLY and others
:
and
Litif, et al v. US
as 10-1417
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis, ROBERT P. DAVIS, Administrator of the Estate of Debra Davis, MARION HUSSEY, in her capacity as administratrix of the Estate of Deborah Hussey and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANNA M. LITIFF, individually, and in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis R. Litif, LUANNE LITIF and LEE LITIF
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JOHN J. CONNOLLY, JOHN M. MORRIS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
:
, and
Litif, et al v. Federal Bureau of In, et al
as 1:2002cv11791
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Litif , Luanne Litif , Lee Litif and others
Defendant:
John J. Connolly, Jr. , John M. Morris and USA
Consolidated_plaintiff:
John E. Davis , Robert P. Davis and Marion Hussey
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
