Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Banerjee v. Greenberg
as 8:2020cv02728
Defendant:
Robert A. Greenberg
Plaintiff:
Mithun Banerjee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kevin Adams v. Mark Elrich
as 20-1988
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN PATRICK MORRISSEY, Chief Judge District Court Headquarters Maryland Judicial Center, in his official and or non-official capacity, JASON CAREW, Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, in his official and non-official capacity, JOHN HAFER, Parole and Probation in his official and or non-official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN CHRISTOPHER ADAMS
Adams v. Mark Elrich Montgomery County Maryland et al
as 8:2020cv02366
Defendant:
Patricia Lisehora Kane, Richard DeMocker, Jill Reid Cummins and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pramco II, LLC v. David Kissi
as 09-1413
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, EMIL HIRSCH and O'CONNOR & HANNAN, LLP
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI, Individually and in his capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust
Defendant - None:
EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI and AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST
Respondent - None:
DAVID MUCHOW
Party-in-Interest - None:
CHRISTOPHER BOWMAR MEAD, RICHARD M. KREMEN, JOSE ANDRADE and others
Garnishee - None:
AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST
Movant - None:
MICHAEL PEARSON and BENNETT AND BAIR, LLP
Pramco II, LLC v. David Kissi
as 08-1829
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PRAMCO II, LLC, EMIL HIRSCH and O'CONNOR & HANNAN, LLP
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID M. KISSI, Individually and in his capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust
Defendant - None:
EDITH TRUVILLION KISSI, Individually and in her capacity as Co-Trustee of the Ammendale Living Trust and AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST
Party-in-Interest - None:
CHRISTOPHER BOWMAR MEAD, RICHARD M. KREMEN, JOSE ANDRADE and others
Respondent - None:
DAVID MUCHOW
Garnishee - None:
AMMENDALE LIVING TRUST
Movant - None:
MICHAEL PEARSON and BENNETT AND BAIR, LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
