Cases 31 - 40 of 60
NEAL v. OLIVER
as 2:2013cv00199
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Respondent:
JOHN C. OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Defendant:
JOHN C. OLIVER, A. RUPSKA, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, STEPHEN COPE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
NEAL v. OLIVER
as 2:2013cv00175
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Respondent:
JOHN C. OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEAL v. OLIVER
as 2:2012cv00364
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Defendant:
JOHN C. OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
NEAL v. CARRAWAY et al
as 2:2012cv00356
Respondent:
J. F. CARRAWAY and JOHN C. OLIVER
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neale v. Washington County Circuit Court
as 3:2012cv02171
Petitioner:
Robert John Neale
Respondent:
Washington County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEAL v. OLIVER
as 2:2012cv00344
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Respondent:
JOHN C. OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEAL v. OLIVER
as 2:2012cv00317
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Respondent:
JOHN C. OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NEAL v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2012cv00298
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, CHARLES L. LOCKETT, AMBER L. NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
