Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 95
Robert Neal v. Warden of SATF, et al
as 17-16238
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT W. NEAL
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN OF SATF and SECRETARY OF CDCR
Robert Neal v. Warden of SATF, et al
as 17-16240
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT W. NEAL
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN OF SATF and SECRETARY OF CDCR
Robert Neal v. Warden, et al
as 17-15276
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT W. NEAL
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, SATF, CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY OF CDCR
Neal v. Warden of SATF et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02778
Petitioner: Robert W. Neal
Respondent: Warden of SATF and Secretary of CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neal v. Warden of SATF et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv05978
Petitioner: Robert W. Neal
Respondent: Warden of SATF, California State Attorney General and Secretary of CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Harris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02279
Plaintiff: Viana B Bailey
Defendant: William Oscar Harris, Robert David Neal and Ralph Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Neal et al v. The United States Of America
as 2:2015mc00800
Plaintiff: Robert Thomas Neal and Christabelle Loza Neal
Defendant: The United States Of America
TAYLOR et al v. SAMUELS et al
as 2:2015cv00097
Defendant: JOHN/ JANE DOES, SARAH QURESHI and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Plaintiff: WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS, ROBERT DAVID NEAL and RALPH TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv01875
Plaintiff: RALPH TAYLOR, WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS and ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Defendant: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., SARAH QURESHI and JOHN/ JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Neal v. Leann LaRiva
as 14-1996
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Respondent - Appellee: LEANN LARIVA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?