Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Todd v. Dean et al
as 4:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Larry Carl Todd
Defendant:
Tim Dean, Candace Bazemores, Andrew Arrons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pennington et al
as 4:2018cv00143
Plaintiff:
Terry Eric Johnson
Defendant:
Frank Pennington, Lori T. Loncon, Robert Attridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Middleton et al
as 4:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Rashond W. Baker
Defendant:
Christopher Middleton and Robert Attridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Attridge
as 4:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Aceem Grant
Defendant:
Robert Attridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Attridge et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01008
Plaintiff:
Robert Attridge and Greta Goplen
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Thomas P Schmalzried, MD and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robert Attridge et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-01389
Plaintiff:
Robert Attridge and Greta Goplen
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Thomas P. Schmalzreid, M.D. and others
Robert Attridge et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01389
Plaintiff:
Robert Attridge and Greta Goplen
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Does, Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Alfred Perry v. Frank Pennington, et al
as 12-14862
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK PENNINGTON, in his capacity as Assistant District Attorney and ROBERT ATTRIDGE, in his capacity as Assistant Public Defender
Perry v. Pennington et al
as 4:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
Alfred Perry
Defendant:
Frank Pennington and Robert Attridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. St. Lawrence et al
as 4:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
Zachary Taylor
Defendant:
Al St. Lawrence, M. Graves, Larry Chisolm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
