Cases 31 - 40 of 145
(HC) Hendon v. Burton
as 1:2022cv00416
Petitioner:
Carlos Hendon
Respondent:
Robert Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Uhuru v. Benavidez et al
as 3:2022cv00489
Petitioner:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru, Priest, Diallo Dynomite and others
Respondent:
J. Benavidez, Robert Burton, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Henry v. Burton
as 2:2022cv00609
Petitioner:
Robert Henry
Respondent:
Robert Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Springfield v. Burton
as 2:2022cv00568
Petitioner:
Ciron B. Springfield
Respondent:
Robert Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Mims v. Burton
as 2:2022cv00521
Petitioner:
George Mims
Respondent:
Robert Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Wolinski v. Allison et al
as 2:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
Krzysztof F. Wolinski
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Deb Anderson and Robert Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ciron B. Springfield v. Kathleen Allision et al
as 2:2022cv01220
Plaintiff:
Ciron B. Springfield
Defendant:
Kathleen Allision, Cherri Pham, CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilera v. Burton
as 1:2022at00105
Petitioner:
Aaron Michael Aguilera
Respondent:
Warden Robert Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Aguilera v. Burton
as 1:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Aaron Michael Aguilera
Respondent:
Robert Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
